Chikungunya-Dengue may affect tourism, aviation sectors

The outbreak of Chikungunya- Dengue in Delhi and many other places across India be dealt with on a war-footing both by the Centre and the state governments as the disease taking epidemic proportion besides affecting human life is also expected to result in a loss to the tourism and aviation industries.

As per an assessment, Delhi registers about 35 per cent of India's total foreign tourist influx as they use the national Capital as a transit during their travel. Delhi which attracts fairly large number of foreign tourists during the peak season set to begin from October every year should deal with the epidemic appropriately so that the people coming here face no threat.

In the winter, roughly 2.5-3 lakh foreign tourists visit the Golden triangle Circuit of Delhi-Agra-Jaipur, accounting for about 30 per cent of the total number of the inbound traffic in the country.    

With big number of Chikungunya- Dengue victims in Delhi being, the number of tourists visiting Jaipur, Udaipur, Jodhpur, Bikaner, Jaisalmer and other locations in the western state is coming down drastically as the state government itself is cautioning tourists against the disease.

With increasing cases of Chikungunya-Dengue and the kind of negative reaction on the tourists, the tourist traffic can drop drastically leaving a bruising impact on businesses such as hotels, airlines, taxi operators, restaurants etc. Many tour operators are now gearing up with precautionary steps for foreigners arriving in Delhi during the peak tourist season set to begin from October this year.

In all, the monthly foreign exchange earnings from the foreign tourists arrivals are between 1.5-two billion USD a month during the winter. While the arrivals get disbursed to Maharashtra, south India and Goa coasts, a large concentration is around the Golden triangle.

As per the data, the Percentage share of Foreign Tourist Arrivals (FTAs) in India during July, 2016 among the top 15 source countries was highest from Bangladesh (17.30%) followed by  USA (16.51%), UK (11.67%), Malaysia (3.49%), France (3.12%), Sri Lanka (2.94%), Canada (2.66%), China (2.32%), Germany (2.31%), Japan (2.20%), Australia (2.20%), Nepal (2.04%), Oman (2.04%), UAE (1.99%) and Pakistan (1.66%).

The Percentage share of  Foreign Tourist Arrivals (FTAs) in India during July, 2016 among the top 15 ports was highest at Delhi Airport (26.22%) followed by Mumbai Airport (17.04%), Chennai Airport (10.11%),  Haridaspur Land check post (9.82%), Bengaluru Airport (7.31%), Cochin Airport (5.14%), Hyderabad Airport (5.04%),Kolkata Airport (4.20%), Gede Rail (1.97%), Ahmadabad Airport (1.91%), Trivandrum Airport (1.91%), Tiruchirapalli Airport (1.55%), Attari-Wagah Land check post (1.09%), Amritsar Airport (0.97%) and Ghojadanga land check post (0.71%).

India is targeting to attract 1 per cent of world tourists by 2020 and about 2 per cent by 2025, banking heavily on India's strong tourism potential.

Will take 126 years for India to reach education standards of developed nations: ASSOCHAM Paper

India does have ambitions to reach the level of developed nations in education, but it will take at least six generations or 126 years to scale up to the top  standard , if the country continues at its present pace in one of the most vital sectors, an ASSOCHAM Paper has said.

“Though India has made rapid strides, the yawning gap between the standards of education does not seem to bridge soon as the developed world has not slowed down spending on education”, the paper noted.

It said with India spending mere 3.83 per cent of its Gross Domestic Product (GDP) on education, it is not sufficient to   catch up. “It will take six generations or 126 years to catch up with developed countries if we do not change our education system dramatically”.

The US spends 5.22 per cent of its GDP on education, whereas for Germany it is 4.95 per cent and UK 5.72 per cent. “With the GDP base of these developed counties so high, the absolute money earmarked for education is huge. For instance the size of the US GDP would be something like seven times the size of the Indian GDP and then on top of it, its ratio on education on a higher base would be very significant”, according to ASSOCHAM Secretary General.

It is also noted that India has a resource constraint, but then, the country must catch up to reach the levels of spending as recommended by the United Nations, which wants countries to spend at least six per cent of their GDP on education.

If India steps up its resource commitment to education, it can really become a major source of talent to the rest of the world, given the demographic advantage it has. With 315 million students, it has the largest pupil population in the world, besides being the youngest country.

Shortages of quality teachers are among the major challenges for the education sector, the paper said. At present, the shortage of teachers has been measured at 1.4 million. Besides 20 per cent of the teachers do not measure up to the standards of the National Council for Teachers’ Education (NCTE) it is reported.

Also, due to absence of focus on effective skill development, India is one of the least skilled countries. Majority of the college graduates and post graduates have employability challenges.  This is ironical because India has a surplus work force but it is not skilled enough.

In our country only 4.7 per cent of the work force has any formal training, whereas this figure is 80 per cent for Japan, 95 per cent for South Korea, 75 per cent for Germany, 68 per cent for UK and 52 per cent for the US.

Very amusing!

It is a subject of great amusement for me, and I am sure many of my friends who read this may feel the same when certain teachers categorised as good over others and recognised at city, district or national levels on different occasions. Without prejudice against anyone, the most amusing part is that there is no benchmark or standards lay so far which ascertains the good from the bad specially so in a field like education.

Without a proper benchmark or a survey conducted where only children of all schools/colleges through some process to name their best “Gurus” how can any agencies other than the pupil adjudge a teacher from outside. If done it is mostly with vested interests.

It is against this background, I could not stop myself from writing this piece, when I again read in a section of press yesterday about some of the so-called “Best Teachers” being awarded on Teachers Day, September 5. I always wonder who best teachers are. How do they look? How and by whom are they spotted, since it is certainly not by the nomination of students who are the real judges for judging the capabilities of a teacher?

I have from my childhood respected all my teachers alike and felt that everyone has contributed his/her bit in my personality development and skills. My respect still remains the same equally for all of them even after my completing formal studies over 25 years back.

In my schooldays time children gave importance and respect to the masters and not categorising them as first, second and third grade, which unfortunately is the practice on rise and made to imbibe in the new generation students.

We cannot discriminate especially in a profession like teaching. If those who feel can do so of categorising good and bad, they must first launch a campaign to weed out the black sheep, if any, from this noble profession to select the best with the help of students. Until done or until there is a transparent standard to gauge the bright from the dull no one has the right to misguide the society, create indifferent opinions and damage sanctity of a noble profession.

Not only this, such unwanted classifications are a big discouragement to that major sections of teachers who do their work very diligently in urban and rural areas alike and does not pomp and show.

It is a pity and shame to see that most of those who queue up for being recognised on a pious occasion like Teachers Day and other such occasions are Principal’s, Vice-Principals, Vice Chancellor’s or some fortunate teachers and some fortunate because of their influential backgrounds.

A true recognition comes to a teacher if his/her student does well. At least fifty percent performance of a child, if not more, rests on a teacher. So the best award or reward for a true teacher is how well his/her student does in studies and later in life.

The Principal’s and Vice Chancellors are in any case not always from teaching but are a part of the management circle and hence not be included under teacher’s category. It really downgrades those who stand by such recognitions and raises a question mark on the selectors and selection rules. Though not all recognised worthless but because of the lack of visibility of fair chance provided to all teachers alike to prove their worth with student’s opinions/ranking strictly taken into consideration these recognitions appear dubious.

Heads of State, senior government functionaries and eminent personalities should refrain and/or minimise endorsements to such exercise until these are thoroughly transparent and checked for being unbiased coupled with students survey for a partial choice of a particular teacher nominated for an award.

Let the sanity of teachers not be ranked. In fact appreciating teachers be encouraged to make them more dedicated to the students and imbibe new techniques of teaching. Also, appreciation of teachers be done at large and not of any specific person unless otherwise there is a very strong and exceptional case of their performance. Such appreciation thoroughly examined in a transparent way before being made public.

Till this model be adopted the “Best Teachers” recognised the present way be made to undergo a scrutiny post award where the students of their institutions be made to vote against their worthiness. The report of such assessments be made public and be conducted by a government agency with public representation. Though this will not fully, but to a large extent be a sieve to the problem.

Uttarakhand Governor Dr.K.K.Paul congratulates Arun Kumar Singhal